Nike sees steap growth numbers in Asia

In this article (5)
Sportswear retailer Nike has grown net income to US$1.1 billion over its third quarter, with the group’s consumer-direct approach delivering growth across all four of its geographic regions.
Revenues increased 7 per cent to $9.6 billion, up 11 per cent. The Nike brand contributed $9.1 billion of this, while footwear brand Converse brought $463 million – down 2 per cent compared to the prior corresponding period.
“In Q3, our team once again drove strong, healthy growth across Nike’s complete portfolio,” Nike chairman, president and CEO Mark Parker said.
“Our business momentum is being accelerated by our ability to scale innovation at a faster pace and expand new digital consumer experiences around the world.”
In Asia-Pacific, the group saw footwear sales increase 3 per cent to $909 million, while apparel sales grew 6 per cent to $340 million.
However, sales in the equipment category fell 8 per cent over the period, to $58 million.
Greater China, saw equipment sales stay flat at $29 million, but experienced a strong 21 per cent growth in apparel sales to $444 million, and footwear sales 19 per cent above the prior period at $1.11 billion.
The group’s gross margin increased over the period to 45.1 per cent, driven by higher selling prices, favourable changes in foreign currency exchange rates and growth in Nike Direct.
Additionally, the group’s effective tax rate was 14.7 per cent, compared to 179.5 per cent during the same period last year, which included one-time charges related to the enactment of the US Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which drove a $921 million loss.
Questions & Answers
Q.What is driving the improvement in Nike's gross margin?
What is driving the improvement in Nike's gross margin?
The group's gross margin increased due to higher selling prices, positive changes in foreign currency exchange rates, and growth in Nike Direct. This suggests successful pricing strategies and efficient direct-to-consumer operations.
Q.How did the Converse brand perform in this period?
How did the Converse brand perform in this period?
Converse contributed $463 million to the total revenue, but its sales were down by 2 per cent compared to the same period last year. This indicates a slight decline for the footwear brand.
Q.What caused the significant difference in the effective tax rate compared to last year?
What caused the significant difference in the effective tax rate compared to last year?
The effective tax rate was 14.7 per cent this period, a sharp contrast to 179.5 per cent last year. This difference was due to one-time charges related to the US Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which resulted in a $921 million loss then.
Q.Which product category saw a decline in sales within the Asia-Pacific region?
Which product category saw a decline in sales within the Asia-Pacific region?
In the Asia-Pacific region, sales in the equipment category fell by 8 per cent over the period, dropping to $58 million. Footwear and apparel sales, however, increased.