Philippines’ House to hold common tower hearing
In this article (5)
A Philippines’ House of Representatives committee will next week hold a hearing on the government’s common tower policy to address the industry opposition and potential legal hurdles of the proposal.
The House Committee on ICT will look into the status of the Department of ICT’s common tower policy during a hearing scheduled for Monday, committee chairman Victor Yap told.
Representatives of Globe Telecom and PLDT, the National Telecommunications Commission, the Department of ICT and the Philippines Competition Commission are all expected to attend.
Under the proposed policy, tower companies will be allowed to build and operate common telecom towers that can be leased to operators. The DICT has signed agreements with a number of tower companies ahead of the introduction of the policy.
As well as helping to improve the Philippines’ telecommunications infrastructure, the common tower policy is aimed at allowing the market’s upcoming third operator Mislatel more quickly deploy a mobile network.
But Globe and PLDT have objected to the draft terms, which had proposed that the number of cell site builders be restricted to two registered tower providers.
According to the operators, this could lead to an infringement of the rights to own and establish cell sites that is stipulated in their legislative franchises.
Questions & Answers
Q.Which organisations are expected to attend the common tower hearing next week?
Which organisations are expected to attend the common tower hearing next week?
Representatives from Globe Telecom, PLDT, the National Telecommunications Commission, the Department of ICT, and the Philippines Competition Commission are all expected to attend the hearing.
Q.What is the primary goal of the proposed common tower policy?
What is the primary goal of the proposed common tower policy?
The common tower policy aims to improve the Philippines' telecommunications infrastructure and allow the upcoming third operator, Mislatel, to deploy its mobile network more quickly across the country.
Q.Why have Globe Telecom and PLDT objected to the draft terms of the policy?
Why have Globe Telecom and PLDT objected to the draft terms of the policy?
Globe and PLDT objected because the draft terms proposed restricting the number of cell site builders to two registered providers. They believe this could infringe their rights to own and establish cell sites.
Q.Who will be responsible for building and operating common telecom towers under the new policy?
Who will be responsible for building and operating common telecom towers under the new policy?
Under the proposed policy, tower companies will be allowed to build and operate common telecom towers. These towers can then be leased to various network operators across the Philippines.
Reader pulse
Is the common tower policy viable?
18,615 votes so far