Skip to content
Living

Sigma chairman Resigns after remuneration protest

By Aiko Tanaka
1 min read
Sigma
Sigma
In this article (5)

Brian Jamieson, chairman of Sigma Healthcare, has said he intends to step down within the next 12 months after shareholders protested the remuneration report at Sigma’s annual general meeting on Wednesday.

Shareholders delivered an 18 percent vote against the report during the meeting, while also opting to re-elect Jamieson, as well as David Manuel, as directors.

The vote signalled shareholders’ frustration over Sigma’s decision to reject a takeover offer by rival healthcare business Australian Pharmaceutical Industries, as well as a protest against the remuneration report itself, which included bonuses for board members in a year that has seen Sigma’s share price fall from 80 cents per share in June 2018 to 53 cents per share.

“This has been a defining year for Sigma,” Jamieson told shareholders at the business’s AGM.

Over the course of the year, Sigma walked away from a supply contract with Chemist Warehouse Group, causing a major fall in the business’s share price hasn’t been recovered.

Sigma also walked away from the proposed merger with API, which Jamieson told shareholders was “somewhat opportunistic, with Sigma at its most vulnerable” after dropping the Chemist Warehouse Group supply contract.

“To agree to proceed may have been the easy decision, but our detailed analysis supported our view that it was not the right decision for mid to long-term shareholder value,” Jamieson said.

Questions & Answers

Q.

What specifically caused shareholders to protest the remuneration report?

A.

Shareholders protested because the report included bonuses for board members, despite Sigma's share price falling significantly from 80 cents to 53 cents per share.

Q.

What was the magnitude of the shareholder vote against the remuneration report?

A.

Shareholders delivered an 18 percent vote against the remuneration report during the annual general meeting on Wednesday.

Q.

What two main issues led to the shareholders' frustration at the AGM?

A.

Shareholders were frustrated by Sigma's decision to reject a takeover offer from API, and by the remuneration report itself, which awarded bonuses.

Q.

What was the chairman's reason for rejecting the merger proposal with API?

A.

The chairman stated the proposal was opportunistic when Sigma was vulnerable, and detailed analysis suggested it was not the right decision for long-term shareholder value.

Reader pulse

Was rejecting the API takeover the right move?

15,973 votes so far

Weekly Briefing

Asia's retail intelligence, in your inbox

Monday, Wednesday and a Friday Weekly Wrap: the retail stories, numbers and moves that mattered across Asia. Nothing else, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

  • Top industry moves and market shifts
  • Weekly data-driven analysis from across Asia
  • Monday, Wednesday and the Friday Weekly Wrap

Read by retail operators, investors and brand teams across Asia.

Protected by a quick human check. No spam, ever. Unsubscribe in one click.

SecureGDPR ready