Skip to content
Food

PepsiCo loses tax fight with ATO

By Maria Santos
1 min read
pepsi
pepsi
In this article (5)

PepsiCo has been ordered by the Federal Court to pay royalty withholding tax and, in the alternative, diverted products tax (DPT), which would apply.

The first time it has been considered in court, DPT is a new tool to ensure large global businesses operating in the country are paying the correct amount of tax by the level of their economic activities.

The tool was designed to prevent the diversion of profits offshore through contrived arrangements and imposes a 40 percent tax penalty rate to be paid upfront.

It is a separate tax liability from income tax; therefore, a taxpayer may have an income tax assessment and DPT assessment for the same period.

The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has been targeting arrangements where royalty withholding tax has not been paid because payments have been mischaracterized, mainly for using intangible assets, such as trademarks.

“The PepsiCo matter is a lead case for our strategy to target arrangements where royalty withholding tax should have been paid,” remarked Deputy Commissioner Rebecca Saint.

“While there may still be more to play out in this matter, it sends strong signals to other businesses with similar arrangements to review and consider their tax outcomes.”

The Tax Avoidance Taskforce (TAT) focuses on multinational tax avoidance and profit shifting. Most large businesses are meeting their tax obligations; however, the ATO said it will continue to use all the tools to challenge those who don’t.

Since 2016, the TAT has secured more than $27.7 billion in additional tax revenue from multinational enterprises and large public and private businesses (up to 31 August this year).

Questions & Answers

Q.

What is the Diverted Products Tax (DPT) and why was it applied in this case?

A.

The DPT is a new tool to ensure large global businesses pay the correct tax based on their economic activities in the country. It prevents the diversion of profits offshore through contrived arrangements, imposing a 40 percent penalty rate.

Q.

How does the DPT differ from standard income tax?

A.

The DPT is a separate tax liability from income tax, meaning a taxpayer can face both an income tax assessment and a DPT assessment for the same period. It specifically targets profit diversion.

Q.

What is the ATO's broader strategy following this ruling against PepsiCo?

A.

The ATO is targeting arrangements where royalty withholding tax has not been paid due to mischaracterised payments, particularly for intangible assets like trademarks. This case is a lead example for their strategy.

Q.

What impact has the Tax Avoidance Taskforce (TAT) had on tax revenue since its inception?

A.

Since 2016, the TAT has secured over $27.7 billion in additional tax revenue from multinational enterprises and large businesses. This figure is accurate up to 31 August of the current year.

Reader pulse

Does this ruling impact your tax strategy?

24,448 votes so far

Weekly Briefing

Asia's retail intelligence, in your inbox

Tuesday, Thursday and a Saturday Weekly Wrap: the retail stories, numbers and moves that mattered across Asia. Nothing else, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

  • Top industry moves and market shifts
  • Weekly data-driven analysis from across Asia
  • Tuesday, Thursday and the Saturday Weekly Wrap

Read by retail operators, investors and brand teams across Asia.

Protected by a quick human check. No spam, ever. Unsubscribe in one click.

SecureGDPR ready