Jaguar Land Rover wins case in China against Evoque copycat

In this article (4)
The court ruled that Landwind must pay JLR compensation. The ruling refers to the original Landwind X7 from 2014 rather than the more recent facelifted model, which toned down some of the more blatant similarities, JLR said. Landwind can continue selling the facelifted version.
The two SUVs have a similar shape, with the roof and windows tapering from front to back, and near-identical tail lights and character lines on the side paneling.
“The ruling is highly significant,” said Michael Dunne, CEO of Hong Kong-based automotive consultant firm ZoZoG. “For years, foreign companies have taken Chinese rivals to court for purloining designs and lost. GM, Mercedes, BMW, Toyota, you name it.”
JLR had its patent on the shape of the Evoque canceled in China in 2016 after a court ruled it was void because the company had patented it outside China first. It responded by suing Jiangling.
“At certain times, Chinese leaders will allow a high-profile foreign “win” in order to win international support, Dunne said.”
The new Evoque will be launched in China in April.
Landwind is one of the few Chinese automakers that does not break down its sales by model, but industry observers estimated the X7 accounted for the bulk of the brand’s 80,000 sales in 2016 at the height of the SUV’s popularity. The X7 costs from the equivalent of 17,100 euros in China, compared to almost 50,000 euros for the Evoque.
The new Range Rover Evoque will be launched in China in April.
Landwind sold 2,746 cars in China in the first two months, making it the 61st best-selling brand, according to figures from sales aggregator Bestsellingcarsblog.com. Land Rover was No. 59 with 3,342 sales, down 61 percent on the year before. Jaguar was No. 68 with sales down 60 percent to 1,931.
JLR’s court victory is rare in China where courts often side with domestic automakers. Fiat lost a case against Great Wall in 2008 after a court ruled that the GW Peri was not a direct copy of Fiat’s Panda, despite strong similarities. Fiat was ordered to pay court costs.
More successful was German coach-maker Neoplan in 2006, after a court ruled that the A9 bus made by the Zonda Industrial Group was a direct copy of the Neoplan Starliner. Zonda was ordered to stop making and selling the bus and ordered to pay 20-million-yuan compensation to Neoplan.
JLR’s China deliveries fell 22 percent to 115,000 last year after the automaker faced quality problems that caused Jaguar and Land Rover owners to protest outside its China headquarters in Shanghai.
Questions & Answers
Q.Which specific Landwind model was found to be a copy of the Evoque?
Which specific Landwind model was found to be a copy of the Evoque?
The Beijing Chaoyang District Court's ruling specifically refers to the original Landwind X7 model from 2014. The more recent, facelifted version of the X7, which has fewer similarities, can still be sold by Landwind.
Q.What happened to JLR's patent on the Evoque's design in China before this case?
What happened to JLR's patent on the Evoque's design in China before this case?
JLR's patent on the Evoque's shape was cancelled in China in 2016. A court ruled it was void because the company had patented the design outside of China before attempting to do so within the country.
Q.How much cheaper is the Landwind X7 compared to the Range Rover Evoque in China?
How much cheaper is the Landwind X7 compared to the Range Rover Evoque in China?
The Landwind X7 costs from the equivalent of 17,100 euros in China. In comparison, the Range Rover Evoque costs almost 50,000 euros in the same market, making the X7 significantly more affordable.
Reader pulse
What does this ruling signify for foreign brands?
24,001 votes so far