Skip to content
Living

Grab eyes stake in Vinasun, taxi company refuses to play ball

By Rajiv Menon
2 min read
grab
grab
In this article (5)

Grab’s surprise offer to buy a $2.78-million stake in top taxi company Vinasun has failed, with the latter asking to end negotiations. The negotiations between the two firms began earlier this month for compensation claimed by Vinasun from the Malaysian ride-hailing firm after the People’s Court of Ho Chi Minh City yet again adjourned hearing of a suit Vinasun had filed last year.

A Vinasun spokesperson told the court following the latest resumption of the trial Wednesday that his firm had declined the offer since Grab had not made an appropriate offer. “We don’t want to continue the negotiations.”

But Grab does not want the lawsuit to continue.

Its spokesperson said: “We have become very tired during the 17 months of this trial for damages we did not cause. We do not want Vinasun to waste its time on this meaningless lawsuit. We consider the proposal to buy Vinasun’s stake an investment activity, and we expect to cooperate with Vinasun to end the case in a good way.”

Vinasun filed the suit against Grab in June last year, accusing it of abusing the Ministry of Transport’s pilot scheme and committing violations.

It said Grab’s illegal activities were responsible for nearly VND42 billion (nearly $1.8 million) of the VND76 billion ($3.25 million) worth of losses it had suffered in 2016 and the first half of 2017.

The trial began last February, but was adjourned a month later to allow for more evidence to be gathered. Grab had protested against the value of Vinasun’s losses.

Last October prosecutors asked the court to accept Vinasun’s petition for compensation of nearly VND42 billion, rejecting Grab’s claim it was a tech firm and not a taxi company.

Grab responded by writing to Prime Minister Nguyen Xuan Phuc to say that identifying it as a taxi firm would be “a step backward from Industry 4.0.”

The latest draft of a transport ministry decree requires firms offering taxi services to register as taxi firms before they can apply ride-hailing technologies.

This means that Grab and other ride-hailing firms have to register afresh as taxi businesses and comply with legal requirements related to operating licenses, drivers’ profiles and taxes.

Questions & Answers

Q.

Why did Grab offer to buy a stake in Vinasun?

A.

Grab made the proposal as an investment activity, expecting to cooperate with Vinasun to end the ongoing lawsuit. Its spokesperson stated they were tired of the 17-month trial for damages they believed they did not cause.

Q.

Why did Vinasun refuse Grab's offer to buy a stake?

A.

Vinasun declined the offer because, according to their spokesperson, Grab had not made an appropriate offer. They stated they did not wish to continue negotiations with the ride-hailing firm.

Q.

What is the basis of Vinasun’s lawsuit against Grab?

A.

Vinasun accused Grab of abusing the Ministry of Transport’s pilot scheme and committing violations. They claimed Grab’s illegal activities caused nearly $1.8 million of their reported $3.25 million losses in 2016 and early 2017.

Q.

How could a new transport ministry decree affect Grab?

A.

The latest draft decree requires firms offering taxi services to register as taxi firms before using ride-hailing technologies. This would force Grab to register afresh as a taxi business and comply with new legal requirements for licenses, drivers, and taxes.

Reader pulse

What does Vinasun's rejection signal?

17,227 votes so far

Weekly Briefing

Asia's retail intelligence, in your inbox

Monday, Wednesday and a Friday Weekly Wrap: the retail stories, numbers and moves that mattered across Asia. Nothing else, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

  • Top industry moves and market shifts
  • Weekly data-driven analysis from across Asia
  • Monday, Wednesday and the Friday Weekly Wrap

Read by retail operators, investors and brand teams across Asia.

Protected by a quick human check. No spam, ever. Unsubscribe in one click.

SecureGDPR ready