Skip to content
General

Google was fined for $57 million under the GDPR

By Aiko Tanaka
2 min read
google sign 3253
google sign 3253
In this article (5)

The CNIL, the French data protection watchdog, has issued its first GDPR fine of $57 million (€50 million). The regulatory body claims that Google has failed to comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) when new Android users set up a new phone and follow Android’s onboarding process. Two nonprofit organizations called ‘None Of Your Business’ (noyb) and La Quadrature du Net had originally filed a complaint back in May 2018 — noyb originally filed a complaint against Google and Facebook, so let’s see what happens to Facebook next. Under the GDPR, complaints are transferred to local data protection watchdogs.

While Google’s European HQ is in Dublin, the CNIL first concluded that the team in Dublin doesn’t have the final say when it comes to data processing for new Android users — that decision probably happens in Mountain View. That’s why the investigation continued in Paris.

The CNIL then concluded that Google fails to comply with the GDPR when it comes to transparency and consent.

Let’s start with the alleged lack of transparency. “Essential information, such as the data processing purposes, the data storage periods or the categories of personal data used for the ads personalization, are excessively disseminated across several documents, with buttons and links on which it is required to click to access complementary information,” the regulator writes.

For instance, if a user wants to know how their data is processed to personalize ads, it takes 5 or 6 taps. The CNIL also says that it’s often too hard to understand how your data is being used — Google’s wording is broad and obscure on purpose.

I agree to the processing of my information as described above and further explained in the Privacy Policy

Second, Google’s consent flow doesn’t comply with the GDPR according to the CNIL. By default, Google really pushes you to sign in or sign up to a Google account. The company tells you that your experience will be worse if you don’t have a Google account. According to the CNIL, Google should separate the action of creating an account from the action of setting up a device — consent bundling is illegal under the GDPR.

If you choose to sign up to an account, when the company asks you to tick or untick some settings, Google doesn’t explain what it means. For instance, when Google asks you if you want personalized ads, the company doesn’t tell you that it is talking about many different services, from YouTube to Google Maps and Google Photos — this isn’t just about your Android phone.

In addition to that, Google doesn’t ask for specific and unambiguous consent when you create an account — the option to opt out of personalized ads is hidden behind a “More options” link. That option is pre-ticked by default (it shouldn’t).

Finally, by default, Google ticks a box that says “I agree to the processing of my information as described above and further explained in the Privacy Policy” when you create your account. Broad consent like this is also forbidden under the GDPR.

The CNIL also reminds Google that nothing has changed since its investigation in September 2018.

Questions & Answers

Q.

Which specific aspects of the GDPR did Google reportedly fail to comply with?

A.

Google reportedly failed to comply with GDPR requirements regarding transparency and consent. The regulator found issues with how essential information was disseminated and how consent was obtained for data processing and personalized ads.

Q.

Why did the French watchdog, CNIL, handle the investigation instead of the Irish data protection authority?

A.

The CNIL concluded that Google's European HQ in Dublin does not have the final say on data processing for new Android users. Decisions likely occur in Mountain View, leading the investigation to continue in Paris.

Q.

What two main problems did the CNIL identify with Google's consent process for new users?

A.

The CNIL found that Google's consent flow illegally bundles account creation with device setup, and it doesn't ask for specific, unambiguous consent for personalized ads, often pre-ticking options and hiding opt-out choices.

Q.

What organisations originally filed the complaint against Google?

A.

Two nonprofit organisations, 'None Of Your Business' (noyb) and La Quadrature du Net, originally filed the complaint against Google in May 2018.

Reader pulse

What does Google's fine mean for retail?

21,253 votes so far

Weekly Briefing

Asia's retail intelligence, in your inbox

Tuesday, Thursday and a Saturday Weekly Wrap: the retail stories, numbers and moves that mattered across Asia. Nothing else, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

  • Top industry moves and market shifts
  • Weekly data-driven analysis from across Asia
  • Tuesday, Thursday and the Saturday Weekly Wrap

Read by retail operators, investors and brand teams across Asia.

Protected by a quick human check. No spam, ever. Unsubscribe in one click.

SecureGDPR ready