Skip to content

Beverage industry lobbies against taxing sweetened drinks

By Minjun Park
2 min read
In this article (5)

Drink makers are lobbying against levying a special consumption tax on sweetened beverages, arguing that they do not contribute to health problems such as obesity.

At a Wednesday workshop to discuss draft amendments to the Law on Special Consumption Tax, Nguyen Thi Lam, former deputy director of the National Institute of Nutrition, cited data showing that obesity is related to an imbalance between energy intake and outtake, and the frequency of physical activity.

“Fat in food causes overweightness and obesity more than drinking soft drinks. There is no link between sweetened beverages and obesity,” she said.

The Ministry of Finance is again considering imposing a tax on sweetened beverages eight years after failing to get other ministries to back it. The ministry said that a “reasonable” special consumption tax on sugary drinks would help protect people’s health in line with World Health Organization recommendations and international practices.

Chris Vanloon, Chairman of the American Chamber of Commerce (Amcham) in Da Nang, said there is currently no definition of “sugary drinks,” so on the basis that the Ministry of Finance provides, the special consumption tax could be imposed on milk, dairy products, special foods for children and women, as well as sports drinks with electrolytes.

Do Thai Vuong at the Vietnam Beer-Alcohol-Beverage Association said the beverage industry is still recovering from the Covid pandemic, facing global economic uncertainties and increased production costs.

Beverage businesses need a stable tax policy environment to return to the numbers they were putting up pre-pandemic, Vuong said.

He added that imposing the tax would be discriminatory without solving any public health problems.
The proposed policy would also cause unwanted consequences for related industries, such as sugar, retail, and packaging, he said.

A manager of Heineken Vietnam stated that the Ministry of Finance’s introduction of barley and non-alcoholic beverages into the taxable category was unreasonable.

According to him, similar factors in terms of materials, processing, forms and flavors are not a legal basis for imposing a special consumption tax.

“It is also inconsistent with the purpose of this tax — restricting or discouraging the consumption of products that are harmful to health,” he said.

Businesses say they want to give regulators more time to analyze and evaluate relevant factors comprehensively and thus develop a suitable tax schedule to avoid negative impacts on consumers and businesses.

However, Dinh Trong Thinh, an expert from the Vietnam Academy of Finance, said the tax rate could be 10%, similar to what Cambodia now applies.

In 2014 the Ministry of Finance had formerly proposed a similar 10% special consumption tax on sweetened beverages, but other ministries opposed it.

It is also considering hikes in the special consumption tax on beer, other alcoholic beverages and cigarettes.

Between 2016 and 2019 it had increased the rate on beer and certain alcoholic beverages from 55% to 65% and on cigarettes and cigars from 70% to 75%.

At the workshop, businesses suggested delaying the hikes, at least until 2025.

Questions & Answers

Q.

What is the main argument beverage makers are using against the proposed special consumption tax?

A.

Drink makers argue sweetened beverages do not contribute to health problems like obesity. They suggest obesity is more related to an imbalance in energy intake and outtake, and the frequency of physical activity, with fat in food causing more overweightness than soft drinks.

Q.

Why is it argued that the proposed tax could be discriminatory and harm public health efforts?

A.

The tax is seen as discriminatory without solving public health problems. It could also negatively affect related industries such as sugar, retail, and packaging, while businesses are still recovering from the pandemic and facing economic uncertainties.

Q.

What concern has been raised regarding the definition of 'sugary drinks' for tax purposes?

A.

A concern is that there is currently no definition of 'sugary drinks'. This lack of clarity means the tax could potentially be imposed on milk, dairy products, special foods for children and women, and sports drinks with electrolytes.

Q.

How do beverage businesses propose to address the Ministry of Finance's tax considerations?

A.

Businesses want regulators to take more time to comprehensively analyse and evaluate relevant factors. They aim to develop a suitable tax schedule that avoids negative impacts on both consumers and businesses within the industry.

Reader pulse

Regarding the sweetened beverage tax, do you think it's:

18,820 votes so far

Weekly Briefing

Asia's retail intelligence, in your inbox

Tuesday, Thursday and a Saturday Weekly Wrap: the retail stories, numbers and moves that mattered across Asia. Nothing else, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

  • Top industry moves and market shifts
  • Weekly data-driven analysis from across Asia
  • Tuesday, Thursday and the Saturday Weekly Wrap

Read by retail operators, investors and brand teams across Asia.

Protected by a quick human check. No spam, ever. Unsubscribe in one click.

SecureGDPR ready