Australia may revamp telecoms USO

In this article (5)
Australia’s Productivity Commission has called for the current telecommunications universal service obligation (TUSO) scheme to be scrapped and replaced with a more future-proof regime.
Currently the government has a deal to provide former state-owned operator and fixed line market leader Telstra $300 million per year to ensure fixed voice and payphone services are available to every Australian.
Nearly $3 billion of the 20-year TUSO contract is provided by tax payers, with the remaining $3 billion provided by Telstra and rival operators. But these rivals have often complained about issues including a lack of transparency from Telstra over how it is spending the money.
As with all other markets, fixed voice services have also been declining in popularity as mobile adoption reaches a saturation point.
In a new report, recommended that the current TUSO scheme be replaced with a version that seeks to ensure all Australians have access to a baseline broadband connection including a voice service.
The responsibility for meeting TUSO obligations would also shift from Telstra to the state-owned national broadband network (NBN), which is expected to be fully rolled out by 2020.
“In a digital age, the current obligation — requiring Telstra to provide all Australians with access to basic fixed line telephones and payphones — is anachronistic and needs to change,” commissioner Paul Lindwall said.
“Once rolled out to all Australians, the NBN will be the foundation on which a future broadband based telecommunications universal service policy should be built. A completed NBN, which provides broadband and voice services to all Australians, will make the current TUSO obsolete.”
But the commission has acknowledged that there could be difficulties ensuring a basic broadband service is provided in areas only due to be served by the wireless and satellite component of the NBN.
Questions & Answers
Q.What is the main reason for the proposed change to the current telecommunications universal service obligation?
What is the main reason for the proposed change to the current telecommunications universal service obligation?
The current scheme, which requires fixed voice and payphone services, is considered anachronistic in a digital age. Fixed voice services are also declining in popularity as mobile adoption reaches saturation.
Q.Who currently funds the universal service obligation, and what is the annual cost?
Who currently funds the universal service obligation, and what is the annual cost?
The government pays Telstra £300 million per year. Taxpayers provide nearly £3 billion over 20 years, with Telstra and rival operators contributing the remaining £3 billion.
Q.What would the proposed new universal service obligation focus on instead of fixed voice and payphones?
What would the proposed new universal service obligation focus on instead of fixed voice and payphones?
The new scheme would aim to ensure all Australians have access to a baseline broadband connection, including a voice service. This would be built upon the NBN once fully rolled out.
Q.Which organisation would take over responsibility for the universal service obligation if the changes are implemented?
Which organisation would take over responsibility for the universal service obligation if the changes are implemented?
The state-owned national broadband network (NBN) would take over responsibility for meeting the obligations. The NBN is expected to be fully rolled out by 2020.
Reader pulse
Is changing the TUSO a good move?
18,241 votes so far