After Toshiba scandal, foreign investors want tougher Japan governance steps
In this article (5)
Japan needs bolder measures such as harsher criminal sanctions for fraud and whistleblower protections to improve corporate transparency and prevent a repeat of the accounting scandal seen at Toshiba Corp, foreign investors and governance experts said.
Toshiba’s chief executive Hisao Tanaka and a string of other senior officials resigned on Tuesday after an independent inquiry found he had been aware the company had inflated its profits by $1.2 billion over several years.
The scandal is a major setback for the government of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who has made improving corporate governance a central theme in his bid to reinvigorate Japan’s economy and entice more foreign capital.
“This is a negative headline in what’s been 18 months of positive momentum in Japan,” said Singapore-based David Smith, head of corporate governance at Aberdeen Asset Management, which owns Japan stocks. An Aberdeen affiliate had a very small equity holding in Toshiba as of end-May, Reuters data shows.
“This is a black mark for corporate Japan in the face of positive news and strong markets. The government may want to act tough,” said Smith, who helps manage about $115 billion in Asia.
Japan’s listed companies have long-had tense relations with their foreign shareholders, who have frequently blamed long-term insiders’ dominance of corporate boards for low returns and weak oversight.
In response to this criticism, the Abe government last month introduced new rules requiring listed company boards to appoint at least two outside independent directors, but investors said this did not go far enough – Toshiba already had four independent directors as part of its 16-person board.
“The Toshiba scandal further underlines the need for board training as well as a robust whistleblower protection system,” said Seth Fischer, chief investment officer at Hong Kong-based hedge fund Oasis Management and a corporate governance activist who successfully pushed for reforms at Nintendo Co Ltd.
“The government may want to act tough,” said Smith, who helps manage about $115 billion in Asia.”
“Whistleblowers are ultimately performing a service to the company, its executives and the company’s overall mission – which is integrity of financial statements. They need to be rewarded as such,” he said.
This week’s revelations come four years after a similar scandal in which camera-maker Olympus Corp concealed nearly $1.7 billion in losses from shareholders.
Both scandals also raise questions about the quality of Japan company audits, which rate poorly compared with developed market peers, according to data compiled by Hong Kong-based GMT Research.
“One of the problems is that audit fees are very low in Japan. It’s nonsense that auditors, on these fees, are doing any proper work,” said Robert Medd, a partner at GMT.
Questions & Answers
Q.What specifically caused the Toshiba CEO and other senior officials to resign?
What specifically caused the Toshiba CEO and other senior officials to resign?
Hisao Tanaka and other officials resigned after an independent inquiry found Tanaka knew the company had inflated its profits. The company overstated its profits by $1.2 billion over several years.
Q.How are foreign investors reacting to the Toshiba scandal?
How are foreign investors reacting to the Toshiba scandal?
Foreign investors and governance experts are calling for bolder measures like harsher criminal sanctions for fraud and whistleblower protections. They see the scandal as a major setback for Japan's corporate governance reforms.
Q.Did Toshiba already have independent directors on its board when the scandal broke?
Did Toshiba already have independent directors on its board when the scandal broke?
Yes, Toshiba already had four independent directors on its 16-person board. Investors believe this shows the new rules requiring two independent directors do not go far enough.
Q.What concerns are being raised about the quality of company audits in Japan?
What concerns are being raised about the quality of company audits in Japan?
The scandals raise questions about the quality of Japan company audits, which rate poorly compared with developed market peers. One problem identified is that audit fees are very low in Japan.