With Oil Past Peak, Shell Vows To Eliminate Carbon By 2050
In this article (5)
Energy giant Royal Dutch Shell vowed to eliminate net carbon emissions by 2050, raising its ambition from previous targets, as oil output was set to decline from its 2019 peak. The Anglo-Dutch company is in the midst of its largest overhaul yet as it prepares to expand its renewables and low-carbon business in the face of growing investor pressure on the oil and gas sector to battle climate change. Shell last year laid out a plan to reach net-zero by 2050, in line with the Paris climate agreement and European Union ambitions, but it said the goal depended on its customers.
In a strategy update on Thursday, Shell outlined plans focused on rapid growth of its low-carbon businesses, including biofuels and hydrogen, although spending will stay tilted towards oil and gas in the near future.
“We will use our established strengths to build on our competitive portfolio as we make the transition,” CEO Ben van Beurden said in a statement. Investors welcomed the upgraded targets.
“Shell’s net-zero target is industry-leading and comprehensive as it covers all their carbon emissions,” Adam Matthews, Director of Ethics & Engagement for the Church of England Pensions Board, who led investor engagement with Shell, said in a statement.
Shareholders will be able to vote on Shell’s transition plan at this year’s general meeting, an industry first, Matthews added.
Shell shares were down 1.1% at 0840 GMT. Its strategy is to continue to rely on its retail business, the world’s largest, aiming to increase the number of sites to 55,000 by 2025 from today’s 46,000 and increase the number of electric vehicle charging points to 500,000 from 60,000 now.
Shell did not outline any plans to grow its solar and wind power generation capacity, marking a difference from rivals, such as BP and Total, which both aim to boost their ownership of physical wind and solar farms.
In the near term, Shell will invest at least $5 billion a year in what it calls its growth pillar, dividing the investment roughly equally between its trading and retail business and renewables units. It previously aimed to spend up to $3 billion on renewables and marketing combined.
“We will use our established strengths to build on our competitive portfolio as we make the transition,”
Its upstream business, or oil and gas production, will attract a larger share of its budget at $8 billion. It will also spend $4 billion on its liquefied natural gas (LNG) business and up to $5 billion on chemicals and refining.
Total spending is expected to remain within a range of $19 to $22 billion per year.
Shell, which said its greenhouse gas emissions peaked in 2018, accelerated its plans to reduce carbon emissions. It aims to reduce its net intensity by between 6% and 8% from 2016 levels by 2023. The target rises to 20% by 2030, 45% by 2035 and 100% by the middle of the century. The company previously said it would reduce its net carbon footprint emission intensity metric by at least 3% by 2022, 30% by 2035 and 65% by 2050 from a 2016 baseline.
Intensity levels represent emissions per unit of energy produced, technically allowing higher production. Most European energy majors have set some kind of net-zero carbon target by 2050.
Shell’s ambition differs from BP’s in that it covers the emissions from the end-use of products other companies have produced but which Shell sells to customers.
Shell’s total carbon emissions, which include its own production as well as sales of products to customers, peaked in 2018 at 1.7 gigatonnes. Shell is the world’s largest oil and gas trader. Oil production is expected to gradually be reduced by 1% to 2% each year from a 2019 peak of around 1.8 million barrels per day, including divestments of oilfields and the natural decline of fields. But it will rely on revenue from its oil and gas division to pay for shareholder returns and the transition. BP aims to reduce its oil output by 40% by 2030.
Questions & Answers
Q.How will Shell fund its transition to a low-carbon business, given its ambitious targets?
How will Shell fund its transition to a low-carbon business, given its ambitious targets?
Shell plans to rely on revenue from its oil and gas division to fund shareholder returns and the transition. Its strategy involves investing at least $5 billion annually in its growth pillar, alongside larger budgets for upstream oil and gas, LNG, chemicals, and refining.
Q.What is the key difference between Shell's net-zero ambition and those of its rivals, such as BP?
What is the key difference between Shell's net-zero ambition and those of its rivals, such as BP?
Shell's ambition covers all its carbon emissions, including those from the end-use of products it sells to customers. This differs from BP, which plans to reduce its oil output by 40% by 2030, but the article does not specify BP's emission coverage.
Q.What are Shell's specific targets for reducing its carbon intensity and when are they expected to be met?
What are Shell's specific targets for reducing its carbon intensity and when are they expected to be met?
Shell aims to reduce its net carbon intensity by 6-8% from 2016 levels by 2023. This target rises to 20% by 2030, 45% by 2035, and 100% by the middle of the century.
Q.How does Shell plan to expand its retail business and electric vehicle charging infrastructure?
How does Shell plan to expand its retail business and electric vehicle charging infrastructure?
Shell plans to increase its retail sites to 55,000 by 2025, up from 46,000 currently. It also aims to boost the number of electric vehicle charging points from 60,000 to 500,000.
Reader pulse
Is Shell's retail expansion a smart move?
17,382 votes so far