Skip to content
Finance

UBS’s Hong Kong IPO Sponsorship Ban Lifted

By Aiko Tanaka
1 min read
UBS Bank scaled
UBS Bank scaled
In this article (4)

Hong Kong’s market regulator demonstrated leniency by lifting UBS’s IPO sponsorship ban two months early due to satisfaction with its enhanced governance processes.

The Securities and Future Commission (SFC) cited a 10-month review as the basis of its decision to lift the ban against UBS which prevents the bank from leading initial public offerings.

The SFC was «satisfied after its own assessment that UBS has clear requirements and procedures in place to enable staff members to understand and properly perform their responsibilities», it said in a statement adding that compliance was further enabled by systems, controls, policies, and procedures it found effective based on a separate independent review.

The ban was imposed against UBS following due diligent failures on three previous IPOs – China Forestry, Tianhe Chemicals, and China Metal Recycling – that also resulted in a HK$375 million ($48.2 million) fine. In the case of Tianhe Chemicals, for example, there was a failure to follow up on a meeting with the manufacturer’s alleged largest customer, named only as X, who appeared at a meeting with no business card or other identification and left abruptly.

«The SFC would like to make clear that the standards assessed in the case of UBS are equivalent to those that are expected to be adopted by all licensed sponsors,» the regulator added.

Questions & Answers

Q.

Why was UBS's ban on sponsoring IPOs lifted earlier than expected?

A.

The Securities and Future Commission lifted the ban two months early because it was satisfied with UBS's improved governance processes. A 10-month review confirmed UBS had clear requirements and effective systems in place for staff responsibilities and compliance.

Q.

What issues led to the initial ban and fine for UBS?

A.

The ban and a HK$375 million fine were imposed due to due diligence failures on three IPOs: China Forestry, Tianhe Chemicals, and China Metal Recycling. One example involved failing to properly investigate an alleged customer of Tianhe Chemicals.

Q.

What specific due diligence failure was highlighted regarding Tianhe Chemicals?

A.

A key failure involved not following up on a meeting with an alleged major customer, named only as X. This individual appeared without identification and abruptly left the meeting, raising red flags that were not properly addressed.

Reader pulse

Is this an encouraging sign for the HK market?

24,030 votes so far

Weekly Briefing

Asia's retail intelligence, in your inbox

Tuesday, Thursday and a Saturday Weekly Wrap: the retail stories, numbers and moves that mattered across Asia. Nothing else, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

  • Top industry moves and market shifts
  • Weekly data-driven analysis from across Asia
  • Tuesday, Thursday and the Saturday Weekly Wrap

Read by retail operators, investors and brand teams across Asia.

Protected by a quick human check. No spam, ever. Unsubscribe in one click.

SecureGDPR ready