UBS Singed by Archegos

In this article (4)
Switzerland’s largest bank didn’t escape the Archegos wreckage unscathed. UBS’ singing is however far from the burn that rival Credit Suisse is nursing.
Zurich-based UBS, the sixth-largest prime broker according to data provider Preqin, also catered to troubled hedge fund Archegos. Yet the Swiss bank was mum as its crosstown rival Credit Suisse warned of a major hit against its first-quarter results.
The damage unleashed at Credit Suisse by the hedge fund now reportedly tallies at as much as $5 billion. How did UBS, which ranks directly behind Credit Suisse in catering to hedge funds, escape a similar fate?
The answer is that the Swiss wealth management giant didn’t entirely, according to a person familiar with the matter. UBS, silent this week as Credit Suisse issued its profit warning, is reportedly still unwinding a series of complicated instruments when it called margin on the hedge fund.
Though estimates vary, the bank believes it will be left nursing losses of not more than low-three-digit millions from business with Archegos, the person said. The damage isn’t such that it will neither torpedo UBS’ quarterly profits nor trigger a warning, the person noted. A spokeswoman for UBS declined to comment.
Analysts expect a quarterly profit of $1.44 billion from UBS when it reports on April 27, according to a consensus compiled by the bank itself. Executives at both banks scrambled late last week to evaluate the Archegos debris, with Swiss regulator Finma intervening early on.
UBS’ top investment banker Rob Karoskfy, risk chief Christian Bluhm, and finance overseer Kirt Gardner were among the top executives involves. The Swiss bank apparently feels confident enough it can extricate itself from the wreckage without wiping out the quarterly progress.
This puts UBS squarely in the camp of Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, which were both able to offload their Archegos holdings quickly. By contrast, Credit Suisse and Japan’s Nomura, which on Monday flagged a $2 billion hit, weren’t as fast.
The episode illustrates that UBS’ risk limits held in this case, while raising manifold questions about Credit Suisse’s limits. The latter’s shares slumped more than 16 percent since the bank disclosed the Archegos hit on Monday; investors sent UBS’ shares just three percent lower over the same period.
Questions & Answers
Q.Why did UBS not suffer as severely from the Archegos situation compared to Credit Suisse?
Why did UBS not suffer as severely from the Archegos situation compared to Credit Suisse?
UBS was reportedly still unwinding complex instruments when it called margin on Archegos, but its risk limits held. This allowed UBS to offload its Archegos holdings relatively quickly, unlike Credit Suisse.
Q.What is the estimated financial impact of the Archegos situation on UBS?
What is the estimated financial impact of the Archegos situation on UBS?
UBS expects to face losses of no more than low-three-digit millions from its business with Archegos. This amount is not expected to torpedo its quarterly profits or trigger a warning.
Q.Which executives at UBS were involved in assessing the Archegos fallout?
Which executives at UBS were involved in assessing the Archegos fallout?
UBS’ top investment banker Rob Karoskfy, risk chief Christian Bluhm, and finance overseer Kirt Gardner were among the senior executives involved in evaluating the Archegos wreckage.
Reader pulse
UBS's Archegos handling:
17,704 votes so far