Skip to content
Finance

UBS Pursued in Forex-Rigging

By Wei Zhang
1 min read
ubs
ubs
In this article (4)

The bank is part of a $1.24 billion lawsuit by investors who want damages back following a scandal over rigging currency exchange markets. It revives another scandal from UBS’ past.

The Swiss-based bank is one of five major foreign exchange dealers hit by a 1 billion pounds ($1.24 billion) class-action lawsuit in London, according to Reuters. This revisits a $545 million fine UBS paid four years ago for its role in a global currency-rigging scheme.

The lawsuit is an attempt to mimic U.S. class-action suits, where a group of people claiming damages are pooled into one legal process. It was filed against Goldman Sachs, HSBC, Barclays, J.P. Morgan, and the Swiss bank by an American law firm. A spokesman for UBS declined to comment.

Last week, UBS flagged a potential class action in its quarterly report: Certain class members have excluded themselves from that [U.S. class action] settlement and have filed individual actions in US and English courts against UBS and other banks, alleging violations of U.S. and European competition laws and unjust enrichment, the bank said.

UBS escaped relatively lightly in the U.S. settlement because it turned whistleblower and quickly cooperated with authorities and copped to a charge of wire fraud. The Swiss bank is still among the top-five dealers in global foreign exchange. The market is estimated at north of $5 trillion-a-day by the Bank for International Settlements.

Questions & Answers

Q.

What is the total value of the class-action lawsuit against the five major foreign exchange dealers?

A.

The class-action lawsuit filed in London is for 1 billion pounds. This figure is also stated as $1.24 billion, which is the total amount sought by investors in damages.

Q.

Which other banks are also named in this new class-action lawsuit?

A.

The class-action lawsuit also targets Goldman Sachs, HSBC, Barclays, and J.P. Morgan, alongside the Swiss bank. An American law firm filed the action against all these major dealers.

Q.

Why did UBS receive a lighter penalty in a previous U.S. Settlement?

A.

UBS escaped with a lighter penalty in the U.S. Settlement because it acted as a whistleblower. The bank quickly cooperated with authorities and admitted to a charge of wire fraud during that earlier investigation.

Reader pulse

Will this lawsuit impact banking partnerships?

24,565 votes so far

Weekly Briefing

Asia's retail intelligence, in your inbox

Tuesday, Thursday and a Saturday Weekly Wrap: the retail stories, numbers and moves that mattered across Asia. Nothing else, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

  • Top industry moves and market shifts
  • Weekly data-driven analysis from across Asia
  • Tuesday, Thursday and the Saturday Weekly Wrap

Read by retail operators, investors and brand teams across Asia.

Protected by a quick human check. No spam, ever. Unsubscribe in one click.

SecureGDPR ready