Skip to content
Automotive

Tesla Driver In Multi-Car Crash Told Police Self-Driving Software Malfunctioned

By Sarah Chen
1 min read
Tesla Plant 1
Tesla Plant 1
In this article (4)

The driver of a 2021 Tesla Model S involved in an eight-vehicle crash last month on San Francisco’s Bay Bridge told police he was in Full-Self Driving (FSD) mode which had malfunctioned, according to a police report made public Wednesday.

The Thanksgiving Day crash on Interstate-80 near Treasure Island resulted in two juveniles being transported to a local hospital to treat minor injuries, leading to lengthy delays on the bridge.

Chief Executive Elon Musk has touted Tesla “Full Self-Driving” software as a potential cash cow for the world’s biggest electric carmaker. But Tesla’s advanced driver assistance systems – and Musk’s claims about them – face growing legal, regulatory and public scrutiny.

Tesla sells the $15,000 FSD software as an ad-on, enabling its vehicles to change lanes and park autonomously. That complements its standard “Autopilot” feature, which enables cars to steer, accelerate and brake within their lanes without driver intervention.

The Tesla driver told police the FSD malfunctioned. Still, police were unable to determine if the software was in operation or if his statement was accurate, according to the report, which was made public after a Reuters request.

The police report said the vehicle made an unsafe lane change and was slowing to a stop, which led to another vehicle hitting the Tesla and a chain reaction of additional crashes.

The police report said if FSD malfunctioned, the driver should have manually taken control of the vehicle.

Tesla did not respond to a request for comment.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), investigating the automaker’s advanced driver assistance systems, did not comment.

Tesla’s says “Full Self-Driving” gives access to more advanced driver assistance features but emphasizes “all Tesla vehicles require active driver supervision and are not autonomous.”

National Transportation Safety Board chair Jennifer Homendy has questioned Tesla’s marketing the feature as “full self-driving,” when it is incapable of that and said Tesla must do more to ensure people do not misuse the feature.

Questions & Answers

Q.

What specifically caused the multi-car crash, according to the police report?

A.

The police report stated the Tesla made an unsafe lane change and then slowed to a stop. This action led to another vehicle hitting the Tesla, which initiated a chain reaction of further collisions involving eight vehicles in total.

Q.

Did the police confirm if the Tesla's Full-Self Driving software was active during the incident?

A.

No, police were unable to definitively determine if the Full-Self Driving software was in operation at the time of the crash. They also could not confirm the accuracy of the driver's statement regarding the malfunction.

Q.

What is the official stance from Tesla regarding the need for driver supervision when using their advanced features?

A.

Tesla states that all their vehicles require active driver supervision, even with advanced driver assistance features like Full Self-Driving. They emphasise that their vehicles are not fully autonomous, despite the feature's name.

Reader pulse

Does this incident change your view on FSD?

20,764 votes so far

Weekly Briefing

Asia's retail intelligence, in your inbox

Monday, Wednesday and a Friday Weekly Wrap: the retail stories, numbers and moves that mattered across Asia. Nothing else, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

  • Top industry moves and market shifts
  • Weekly data-driven analysis from across Asia
  • Monday, Wednesday and the Friday Weekly Wrap

Read by retail operators, investors and brand teams across Asia.

Protected by a quick human check. No spam, ever. Unsubscribe in one click.

SecureGDPR ready