Further steps needed to thwart EU’s move to ban palm oil in biofuels
In this article (5)
More engagements, consultations and follow-up actions are needed to remove the European Union’s (EU) threat to ban palm oil use in biofuels, said industry veteran Tan Sri Dr Yusof Basiron.
The former Malaysian Palm Oil Council CEO said Malaysia’s stance was still not being heeded by the EU Parliament, despite various talks and engagements being undertaken and conducted at the government-to-government level.
“There have been clear statements by the governments of major palm oil-producing countries to oppose the ban and even those hinting at possible trade actions or retaliation, including consulting the World Trade Organisation, to deter the EU from implementing the discriminatory ban on palm oil for biofuels,” he said.
Yusof said the MPOC and the Malaysian Palm Oil Board representative offices in the EU recognised the need to counter the ban when the threat first emerged.
As a result, many initiatives had been taken, including continuous talks with the EU countries, to oppose the proposed ban by the trading bloc.
The EU Parliament voted on Jan 17, 2018, to ban palm oil-based biofuels by 2021, while other vegetable oil-based biofuels such as those from soya oil and rapeseed oil can continue to be used until 2030.
Spain was the latest EU country to speak out against the resolution after France, Sweden, the United Kingdom (Conservative MPs who are part of the governing party of Prime Minister Theresa May), Germany and the Netherlands.
“Nevertheless, 492 MEPs voted in favour of the ban, although the number was far less than the 640 who had voted for it in April 2017,” he said.”
Yusof said palm oil-producing countries had reacted to this singling out of palm biofuels for the ban as a trade discrimination that would affect the imports into the EU, because locally-produced soya and rapeseed oils were not similarly subjected to the ban.
“There are also Members of the European Parliament (MEPs) who are sympathetic to maintaining good trade relations with palm oil-producing countries.
“This is reflected in an amendment submitted by 57 MEPs to drop the ban on palm biofuels. Nevertheless, 492 MEPs voted in favour of the ban, although the number was far less than the 640 who had voted for it in April 2017,” he said.
However, he said, it was common for the EU Parliament to vote based on popularity trends, knowing that the next round of scrutiny for approving the Renewable Energy Directive (RED) Bill would be done at the tripartite meeting or trilogue, where the council would discuss and recommend the final version of the RED Bill.
The trilogue to be held soon will consist of government representatives of EU member countries, the Commission and Parliament.
“It is already envisaged that the Council and Commission, being technically competent with the legal, economic and scientific ramifications of the proposed discriminatory ban on palm oil, are not supportive of the ban.
“We are hopeful that any future ban on the use of biofuels to be approved in the RED Bill will not be discriminatory towards palm oil,” Yusof said.
Questions & Answers
Q.What actions are being taken by palm oil-producing countries to counter the EU’s proposed ban?
What actions are being taken by palm oil-producing countries to counter the EU’s proposed ban?
Palm oil-producing countries are undertaking various talks and engagements at government-to-government level. They have also hinted at possible trade actions, including consulting the World Trade Organisation, to deter the EU ban.
Q.When did the EU Parliament vote on the ban and what was the outcome?
When did the EU Parliament vote on the ban and what was the outcome?
The EU Parliament voted on January 17, 2018, to ban palm oil-based biofuels by 2021. Other vegetable oil-based biofuels are permitted until 2030, with 492 MEPs voting for the ban.
Q.Which EU countries have spoken out against the resolution to ban palm oil in biofuels?
Which EU countries have spoken out against the resolution to ban palm oil in biofuels?
Spain is the latest EU country to speak out against the resolution. Previously, France, Sweden, the United Kingdom (Conservative MPs), Germany, and the Netherlands had also voiced opposition to the ban.
Q.Who will be involved in the upcoming trilogue meeting concerning the Renewable Energy Directive Bill?
Who will be involved in the upcoming trilogue meeting concerning the Renewable Energy Directive Bill?
The trilogue will consist of government representatives from EU member countries, the European Commission, and the European Parliament. This meeting will discuss and recommend the final version of the Renewable Energy Directive Bill.
Reader pulse
Will the EU ban on palm oil biofuels proceed?
23,710 votes so far