Skip to content
Telecom

Southeast Asia Targets USD 11 Billion Subsea Cable Expansion for Route Redundancy

By Maria SantosIndonesia
2 min read
Photo,With,A,Sub sea,Cable,On,The,Seabed,With,Sea
Photo,With,A,Sub sea,Cable,On,The,Seabed,With,Sea
In this article (8)

Telecommunications operators and infrastructure investors are committing USD 11 billion between 2026 and 2035 to build new subsea cable systems across Southeast Asia. The spending will expand the number of active intra-Asian cable lines from 14 in 2025 to 19 by 2035, securing international data bandwidth for regional digital economies and hyperscale cloud providers.

Submarine cables handle more than 99 per cent of international communications traffic in hubs such as Singapore. Under the city-state’s Digital Connectivity Blueprint, authorities plan to double the volume of subsea cable landings over the next decade, backed by an estimated SGD 10 billion (USD 7.4 billion) in predominantly private sector capital.

Rerouting Around Maritime Chokepoints

Engineering plans for newly announced trans-Pacific and regional cables increasingly avoid traditional, direct passages through the South China Sea. Systems including Apricot, Echo, and Bifrost run alternative paths through Indonesian and Philippine territorial waters to connect Southeast Asia directly with North America, Japan, and South Korea. Taking longer perimeter paths increases capital costs and latency, but operators accept the trade-off to shield data links from geopolitical exposure and congested straits.

For enterprise users and cloud operators across Asia-Pacific, these southern corridors remove single-point failure risks that have historically disrupted regional supply chains. Financial platforms, retail marketplaces, and cloud providers gain lower downtime risks during localized outages, while secondary telecom operators in Jakarta and Manila secure direct wholesale access without routing entirely through Singapore.

Equipment Supply and Infrastructure Competition

The supply chain for physical infrastructure remains divided among a handful of global manufacturers. Japan’s NEC and France’s ASN maintain strong market positions in island networks across Indonesia and the wider archipelago, while Chinese suppliers have expanded cable contracts in Cambodia and selected Indonesian domestic systems.

This supplier spread gives regional governments room to balance national security requirements against procurement costs. At the same time, physical reliability remains a constant operational bottleneck. International Telecommunication Union data indicates that human activity, mainly commercial fishing and vessel anchoring, causes 86 per cent of all subsea cable faults, requiring more than 200 offshore repair operations worldwide each year.

Coordinated Regional Master Plans

The push for network redundancy builds on policy commitments laid out in the ASEAN Digital Master Plan 2030, which directs member countries to coordinate subsea repair approvals and landing permits. Previous repair timelines often stretched for months due to overlapping maritime jurisdictions and strict cabotage restrictions in archipelagic waters.

Attention now turns to the planned commissioning of major multi-terabit links, including the Apricot and Bifrost systems, which are scheduled to land initial capacity phases before 2027.

Questions & Answers

Q.

What is the main financial commitment being made and over what period?

A.

Telecommunications operators and infrastructure investors are committing USD 11 billion between 2026 and 2035. This funding is dedicated to building new subsea cable systems across Southeast Asia.

Q.

Why are new subsea cables increasingly avoiding the South China Sea?

A.

Operators are choosing longer perimeter paths through Indonesian and Philippine territorial waters to shield data links from geopolitical exposure and congested straits. This helps remove single-point failure risks for enterprise and cloud users.

Q.

What is the primary cause of subsea cable faults according to ITU data?

A.

International Telecommunication Union data indicates that human activity, specifically commercial fishing and vessel anchoring, causes 86 per cent of all subsea cable faults. This requires over 200 offshore repair operations annually.

Q.

How do newly announced cables like Apricot and Bifrost improve connectivity for specific cities?

A.

These southern corridors allow secondary telecom operators in Jakarta and Manila to secure direct wholesale access. This avoids routing entirely through Singapore, reducing reliance on a single hub.

Reader pulse

Will this subsea cable investment effectively de-risk regional digital commerce?

23,749 votes so far

Weekly Briefing

Asia's retail intelligence, in your inbox

Monday, Wednesday and a Friday Weekly Wrap: the retail stories, numbers and moves that mattered across Asia. Nothing else, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

  • Top industry moves and market shifts
  • Weekly data-driven analysis from across Asia
  • Monday, Wednesday and the Friday Weekly Wrap

Read by retail operators, investors and brand teams across Asia.

Protected by a quick human check. No spam, ever. Unsubscribe in one click.

SecureGDPR ready