Skip to content
Finance

Singapore Needs Capital Injections Beyond $6.5 Billion EQDP, SGX Chairman Says

By Minjun Park
2 min read
sgx
sgx
In this article (9)

Singapore Exchange chairman Koh Boon Hwee said the domestic stock market lacks flow and liquidity, leaving local investors unwilling to take risks on home-grown shares.

Speaking on the sidelines of the Forbes Global CEO Conference on Oct 8, Koh noted that further capital injections will be needed to sustain demand, even as the government allocates $6.5 billion through the Equity Market Development Programme. However, he warned that state injections are not a natural, lasting flow like pension-backed markets in the US.

Koh pointed out that younger Singapore investors have an appetite for risk when buying volatile overseas stocks like Tesla and loss-making SpaceX, but local initial public offerings struggle for traction after listing.

The Exit Route Problem For Growth Firms

Early-stage venture funding finds solid support in Singapore. Even so, early backers need domestic public markets to absorb later-stage equity. Thin local trading volume forces founders abroad to provide exits for their investors.

Regional technology leaders repeatedly bypass the local exchange. Shopee parent Sea listed on the New York Stock Exchange in 2017. Ride-hailing group Grab completed a Nasdaq debut in 2021 through a blank-check combination. In October, Singapore-headquartered data centre developer DayOne filed for a Nasdaq initial public offering, continuing the flow of domestic tech assets to the United States.

Pension Flow Versus Injections

State-backed interventions do not generate the structural momentum of institutional retirement pools. Equities in the United States draw on multiple independent pension systems. These funds constantly deploy fresh capital across public listings, private equity, and venture funds.

“Our challenge right now is to create something that is circular and sustainable,”

The 6.5 billion Singapore dollar injection under the EQDP commits capital without creating an automatic mechanism for ongoing demand. Koh noted that the state fund is invested rather than spent. Standalone allocations leave unresolved questions about long-term reinvestment.

“Our challenge right now is to create something that is circular and sustainable,” said Koh.

Supply Chain Concentration Risks

Capital concentration in Singapore tilts heavily toward established lenders, industrial landlords, and real estate investment trusts. These blue-chip counters trade steadily. Their sheer scale makes rapid compound expansion difficult to maintain over decades.

Backing younger firms offers a route to build consumer-facing companies with proprietary brand equity rather than component suppliers. Tiered supply chains leave component makers vulnerable to sharp order swings. A 5 per cent order cut from a consumer brand can trigger a 15 per cent revenue decline down the manufacturing chain.

Domestic Valuation Gaps

A wide gap between private seed financing and public market liquidity leaves founders with few domestic exit options. If the local exchange cannot provide secondary buyers for high-growth enterprises, early venture capital remains locked abroad once portfolio companies exit in New York or Hong Kong.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore and SGX have reviewed measures to encourage regional listings, while market participants watch DayOne’s pending Nasdaq filing for final pricing terms.

Questions & Answers

Q.

What is the main concern Koh Boon Hwee has about Singapore's domestic stock market?

A.

Koh Boon Hwee believes the domestic stock market lacks flow and liquidity, leading local investors to be unwilling to take risks on home-grown shares. This makes it difficult for local initial public offerings to gain traction after listing.

Q.

Why do Singaporean tech companies often list on overseas exchanges like Nasdaq?

A.

Thin local trading volume forces founders abroad to provide exits for their investors. The local exchange struggles to provide secondary buyers for high-growth enterprises, leaving early venture capital locked abroad if portfolio companies exit in New York or Hong Kong.

Q.

What is the fundamental difference between the EQDP capital injection and pension-backed markets in the US?

A.

State injections are not a natural, lasting flow like pension-backed markets in the US. The EQDP commits capital without creating an automatic mechanism for ongoing demand, whereas US pension systems constantly deploy fresh capital.

Q.

How does capital concentration in Singapore currently affect the market and growth firms?

A.

Capital concentration heavily favours established lenders, industrial landlords, and real estate investment trusts. This makes rapid expansion difficult for blue-chip counters and leaves fewer opportunities to build consumer-facing companies with proprietary brand equity.

Reader pulse

Will Singapore's market injection create lasting liquidity?

24,278 votes so far

Weekly Briefing

Asia's retail intelligence, in your inbox

Monday, Wednesday and a Friday Weekly Wrap: the retail stories, numbers and moves that mattered across Asia. Nothing else, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

  • Top industry moves and market shifts
  • Weekly data-driven analysis from across Asia
  • Monday, Wednesday and the Friday Weekly Wrap

Read by retail operators, investors and brand teams across Asia.

Protected by a quick human check. No spam, ever. Unsubscribe in one click.

SecureGDPR ready