Most IT security teams believe their IoT devices are not secure

In this article (5)
The majority of IT security teams believe that a key gap in their company’s overall security strategy is their inability to identify attacks that use IoT devices as the point of entry, according to a global study conducted by the Ponemon Institute on behalf of HPE’s Aruba.
In fact, more than three-quarters of respondents believe their IoT devices are not secure, with 75% stating that even simple IoT devices pose a threat. Two-thirds of respondents admitted they have little or no ability to protect their “things” from attacks.
The Ponemon Institute study, entitled “Closing the IT Security Gap with Automation & AI in the Era of IoT,” surveyed 4,000 security and IT professionals across the Americas, Europe and Asia to understand what makes security deficiencies so hard to fix, and what types of technologies and processes are needed to stay a step ahead of bad actors within the new threat landscape.
“Despite massive investments in cybersecurity programs, our research found most businesses are still unable to stop advanced, targeted attacks — with 59% believing they are not realizing the full value of their defense arsenal, which ranges from 10 to 75 security solutions,” Ponemon Institute chairman Larry Ponemon said.
“The situation has become a ‘perfect storm,’ with nearly half of respondents saying it’s very difficult to protect complex and dynamically changing attack surfaces, especially given the current lack of security staff with the necessary skills and expertise to battle today’s persistent, sophisticated, highly trained, and well-financed attackers”
The research revealed that in the quest to protect data and other high-value assets, security systems incorporating machine learning and other AI-based technologies are essential for detecting and stopping attacks that target users and IoT devices.
The majority of APAC respondents polled for the report agree that security products with AI functionality will help to reduce false alerts (66%), increase their team’s effectiveness (62%), provide greater investigation efficiencies (57%) and advance their ability to more quickly discover and respond to stealthy attacks (53%).
Questions & Answers
Q.Which regions were included in the Ponemon Institute's study on IoT security?
Which regions were included in the Ponemon Institute's study on IoT security?
The study surveyed security and IT professionals across the Americas, Europe, and Asia to understand security deficiencies and necessary technologies.
Q.What percentage of IT security teams believe simple IoT devices pose a threat?
What percentage of IT security teams believe simple IoT devices pose a threat?
Three-quarters of respondents, or 75%, stated that even simple IoT devices pose a threat to their company's security.
Q.How do security products with AI functionality help teams in the APAC region, according to the study?
How do security products with AI functionality help teams in the APAC region, according to the study?
The majority of APAC respondents believe AI functionality will reduce false alerts, increase team effectiveness, improve investigation efficiencies, and advance discovery of stealthy attacks.
Q.What proportion of businesses feel they are not getting full value from their cybersecurity investments?
What proportion of businesses feel they are not getting full value from their cybersecurity investments?
59% of businesses believe they are not realising the full value of their defence arsenal, which typically includes 10 to 75 security solutions.
Reader pulse
Are your retail IoT devices secure?
21,248 votes so far