Louis Vuitton wins Singapore copycat case

In this article (5)
Luxury brand Louis Vuitton has successfully sued a Singapore retailer for selling imitations of its goods.
The High Court in Singapore ordered Cuffz, a retailer located in Raffles City shopping centre, to pay Louis Vuitton $35,000 in statutory damages for selling wallets which, in the court’s view, “imitated” the French brand’s own products.
The wallets bore the ‘Epi Mark’, Louis Vuitton’s trademark interweaving ridges and valley in a recognisable two-tone effect, according to court documents.
Assistant court registrar Edwin San issued a strongly worded written decision observing Cuffz “demonstrated a contumelious disregard” for Louis Vuitton’s intellectual property rights and was a business which “flagrantly dealt in counterfeit goods”.
The store closed in May last year soon after a police raid led to the seizure of allegedly infringing goods centreplace in this case.
While the victory marks a clear win for Louis Vuitton, with the court’s decision leaving little room for misinterpretation, similar such cases in the past have been less clear cut.
In Hong Kong, six years ago, LV withdrew criminal charges against high profile watch retailer City Chain for trademark infringement, alleging it used the LV flower design in a range of watches. Judges concluded that while the flower patterns were similar to Louis Vuitton’s, they were not identical.
Louis Vuitton had sought $100,000 in damages – but the case was never about money. It was about Louis Vuitton sending a message to retailers that it was prepared to actively protect its trademarks and intellectual property.
Questions & Answers
Q.Which specific design element of Louis Vuitton was imitated by Cuffz?
Which specific design element of Louis Vuitton was imitated by Cuffz?
Cuffz sold wallets featuring the ‘Epi Mark’, which is Louis Vuitton’s distinctive trademark of interweaving ridges and valleys with a two-tone effect. Court documents specified this design as the one being imitated.
Q.What was the total amount of statutory damages Cuffz was ordered to pay Louis Vuitton?
What was the total amount of statutory damages Cuffz was ordered to pay Louis Vuitton?
The High Court in Singapore ordered Cuffz to pay Louis Vuitton $35,000 in statutory damages. This amount was awarded for selling wallets that were deemed to have imitated the French brand's products.
Q.Why did the assistant court registrar criticise Cuffz's actions so strongly?
Why did the assistant court registrar criticise Cuffz's actions so strongly?
Assistant court registrar Edwin San stated that Cuffz “demonstrated a contumelious disregard” for Louis Vuitton’s intellectual property rights. He also described the business as one which “flagrantly dealt in counterfeit goods”.
Q.What was the outcome of Louis Vuitton's previous trademark infringement case in Hong Kong?
What was the outcome of Louis Vuitton's previous trademark infringement case in Hong Kong?
In Hong Kong six years ago, Louis Vuitton withdrew criminal charges against City Chain. Judges concluded that although the flower patterns were similar to LV's, they were not identical, leading to the withdrawal of the case.
Reader pulse
Is this a significant win for luxury brands?
22,457 votes so far