Less energy-efficient air-cons to be phased out

In this article (5)
In a bid to cut Singapore’s energy consumption, the National Environment Agency (NEA) will phase out less energy-efficient air-conditioners by September next year.
Currently, air-conditioning models sold here must have at least one tick on the energy label, which is used to help consumers gauge how energy-efficient a particular electrical appliance is.
From September next year, however, the Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) will be raised and all models here will be required to have at least two ticks.
The electrical appliance will be the first to have the minimum requirement of two ticks, meaning it uses less energy.
The switch will help a household save $100 annually in energy costs, the agency said, adding that it is giving importers, manufacturers and retailers enough time to clear their existing stocks.
Products that are on the market or imported before Sept 1 next year will be exempted from regulations for a year, meaning that they can be on sale until September 2017.
The NEA added that it will review the MEPS from time to time and assess whether standards for household appliances should be raised.
Introduced in 2008, the Mandatory Energy Labelling Scheme also covers refrigerators and clothes dryers. Under it, the more ticks awarded, the more energy-efficient the product is.
According to a 2012 NEA study on household energy consumption, air-conditioning accounted for about 37 per cent of total household electricity consumption – the highest among all home appliances.
The labelling scheme is part of the Government’s bid to reduce its energy consumption and ecological footprint.
Singapore has pledged to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases emitted for each dollar of gross domestic product by 36 per cent from 2005 levels by 2030.
Retailers The Straits Times spoke to yesterday said that they generally had no issues about phasing out the less efficient air-conditioners.
Retailer Gain City, for instance, said that only 3 per cent of its air-conditioners are one tick.
Furniture and electronics retail giant Courts Singapore said it stopped selling one tick air-conditioners last year.
While retailers say air-conditioners that are more energy-efficient are likely to cost more, it will not deter some, like housewife Wendy Choo, from buying them.
“I’ll pay more for energy savings,” said the 57-year-old. “In the long term, you can save a lot in terms of usage cost.”
Questions & Answers
Q.What is the new minimum energy efficiency standard for air-conditioners being introduced?
What is the new minimum energy efficiency standard for air-conditioners being introduced?
From September next year, all air-conditioner models sold in Singapore will be required to have at least two ticks on their energy label. This is a raise from the current minimum of one tick, aiming to cut energy consumption.
Q.How much could a household potentially save annually on energy costs due to this change?
How much could a household potentially save annually on energy costs due to this change?
The agency stated that the switch to more energy-efficient air-conditioners could help a household save $100 annually in energy costs. This saving is attributed to the reduced energy consumption of higher-rated models.
Q.Which other household appliances are currently covered by Singapore's Mandatory Energy Labelling Scheme?
Which other household appliances are currently covered by Singapore's Mandatory Energy Labelling Scheme?
The Mandatory Energy Labelling Scheme, introduced in 2008, also covers refrigerators and clothes dryers. Air-conditioners are the first appliance to have their Minimum Energy Performance Standards raised to two ticks.
Q.When will existing stocks of less efficient air-conditioners no longer be allowed for sale?
When will existing stocks of less efficient air-conditioners no longer be allowed for sale?
Products already on the market or imported before September 1 next year are exempt from the new regulations for one year. This means they can continue to be sold until September 2017.
Reader pulse
What will be the biggest impact for retailers?
16,288 votes so far