IoT malware grew threefold in H1
In this article (5)
In the first half of 2018, IoT devices were attacked with more than 120,000 modifications of malware, according to the Kaspersky Lab IoT report. That’s more than triple the amount of IoT malware seen in the whole of 2017.
Kaspersky Lab warns that the snowballing growth of malware families for smart devices is a continuation of a dangerous trend: 2017 also saw the number of smart device malware modifications rise to 10 times the amount seen in 2016.
The market for IoT devices and their role in everyday life, is growing exponentially. But cybercriminals are seeing the financial opportunities too, and are multiplying and differentiating their attacks as a result.
The danger for consumers who love their IoT gadgets, is that threats can strike unexpectedly, turning seemingly harmless devices into powerful machines for illegal activity. This can include malicious cryptocurrency mining, DDoS attacks, or the discreet inclusion of devices in botnet activities.
Aware of these dangers, Kaspersky Lab experts regularly review the data collected from various sources including our honeypots – decoy devices used to attract the attention of cybercriminals and analyze their activities. The latest updates are striking: during the first half of 2018, the number of malware modifications aimed at IoT devices registered by researchers was more than three times higher than the number registered in the whole of 2017.
The statistics show that the most popular method of IoT malware propagation is still the brute forcing of passwords – repetitive attempts at various password combinations. Brute forcing was used in 93% of detected attacks. In most of the remaining cases, access to an IoT device was gained using well-known exploits.
“60% of the registered attempts to attack our virtual devices were coming from them.”
The devices most often attacking Kaspersky Lab honeypots were routers (by a large margin). 60% of the registered attempts to attack our virtual devices were coming from them. The remaining share of compromised IoT gadgets included a variety of different technologies, such as DVR-devices and printers. The honeypots even registered an attack coming from 33 washing machines.
Different cybercriminals may have different reasons to exploit IoT, but the most popular goal is to facilitate DDoS-attacks by creating botnets. Some malware modifications are also tailored to turn off competing malware, fix its own vulnerabilities and shutdown vulnerable services on the device.
“Compared to personal computers and smartphones, IoT devices might not seem powerful enough to attract cybercriminals and be used in their illegal activity,” notes Mikhail Kuzin, security researcher at Kaspersky Lab. “However, their lack of performance is more than outweighed by their number, and the fact that some smart gadget manufacturers are still not paying enough attention to the security of their products.”
Kuzin adds that even if vendors begin to provide their devices with better security now, it will be a while before old vulnerable devices have been phased out of our homes.
“In addition, IoT malware families are customizing and developing very fast, and while previously exploited breaches have not been fixed, criminals are constantly discovering new ones. IoT products have therefore become an easy target for cybercriminals who can turn simple machines into a powerful device for illegal activity, such as spying, stealing and blackmailing.”
Questions & Answers
Q.What was the total number of IoT malware modifications registered in the first half of 2018?
What was the total number of IoT malware modifications registered in the first half of 2018?
More than 120,000 modifications of malware were registered in the first half of 2018. This figure is over three times higher than the amount seen in the entire year of 2017.
Q.Which method of spreading IoT malware is most commonly used by cybercriminals?
Which method of spreading IoT malware is most commonly used by cybercriminals?
The most popular method of IoT malware propagation is the brute forcing of passwords. This technique was responsible for 93% of detected attacks, involving repetitive attempts at various password combinations.
Q.Which types of devices were most frequently used to attack the Kaspersky Lab honeypots?
Which types of devices were most frequently used to attack the Kaspersky Lab honeypots?
Routers were the devices most often attacking Kaspersky Lab honeypots, accounting for 60% of registered attempts. Other compromised IoT gadgets included DVR-devices, printers, and even washing machines.
Q.What is the primary motivation for cybercriminals to exploit IoT devices?
What is the primary motivation for cybercriminals to exploit IoT devices?
The most popular goal for exploiting IoT devices is to facilitate DDoS-attacks by creating botnets. Some malware also aims to turn off competing malware, fix its own vulnerabilities, and shutdown vulnerable services.
Reader pulse
Is your business sufficiently prepared for IoT security threats?
21,774 votes so far