European Luxury Groups Shed €250 Billion as China Demand Slumps

In this article (9)
European luxury groups shed approximately €250 billion in market value this year as spending across mainland China slowed sharply. The decline forced earnings misses at LVMH, Kering and Hermes after a prolonged property downturn and financial market weakness eroded high-end consumption.
Europe’s six largest listed luxury houses, including Richemont, Prada and Moncler, absorbed combined market capitalisation losses of €251 billion. LVMH lost €131.6 billion in value, while Hermes surrendered €93.3 billion as Chinese retail sales growth averaged under 0.5 per cent monthly over the past six months.
Contracting Sales Across Major Houses
Third-quarter disclosures pointed to widespread deterioration in client demand. Sales at LVMH’s fashion and leather goods division dropped by a mid-teens percentage among Chinese shoppers worldwide.
Kering experienced an even sharper contraction. Group revenue from Chinese consumers fell between 15 and 20 per cent during the third quarter, worsening from the mid-teens decline recorded in the previous three months.
Hermes recorded a 2 per cent decline in global ready-to-wear and accessories revenue. The house faced headwinds from falling equity prices in China alongside tighter regulatory scrutiny on overseas capital.
Tax Pressures and Market Contraction
Chinese authorities enacted a 20 per cent tax targeting dividends and interest income generated from offshore trusts. The policy took effect this week, adding fiscal pressure on affluent domestic shoppers who drive personal luxury sales.
Financial markets offered no buffer. The CSI 300 index dropped 19 per cent over four months, erasing more than US$2 trillion in value as investors pulled back over domestic consumption trends and technology equity volatility.
Broader consumer sentiment weakened alongside personal balance sheets, as the property slump and falling stock markets undermined domestic demand.
Divergence in Luxury Resilience
The downturn did not cut evenly across every luxury brand. Hermes expanded sales of Birkin bags and top-tier leather goods by 10.8 per cent globally, sustained by ultra-wealthy buyers.
Fine jewellery also held up. LVMH’s Tiffany and Kering’s Boucheron produced double-digit percentage revenue increases during the quarter, outperforming ready-to-wear lines and standard footwear.
Labels reliant on aspirational middle-class shoppers absorbed the heaviest hits. Kering struggled directly as shoppers postponed entry-level purchases, whereas houses anchored strictly to ultra-high-net-worth allocations preserved margin stability.
Pressures Spread Beyond Asian Borders
American spending failed to offset the drag from mainland China. Citi credit card transaction figures showed luxury purchasing falls of at least 4 per cent across July, August and September.
Rising fuel costs and cooling stock performance curtailed discretionary outlays in the United States. Kering confirmed mounting strain on American household expenditure heading into the November elections.
For luxury operators in Asia, capital allocations will shift from aggressive footprint expansion toward cost controls and productivity gains per square metre.
Questions & Answers
Q.Which brands and market segments proved most resilient during the downturn?
Which brands and market segments proved most resilient during the downturn?
Ultra-wealthy demand sustained top-tier items, with Hermes increasing global sales of Birkin bags and fine leather goods by 10.8 per cent. High-end jewellery also remained strong, as LVMH’s Tiffany and Kering’s Boucheron both delivered double-digit revenue growth despite broader drops in ready-to-wear apparel.
Q.What economic policies and market factors curtailed Chinese luxury spending?
What economic policies and market factors curtailed Chinese luxury spending?
Chinese authorities introduced a 20 per cent tax targeting offshore trust dividends and interest income alongside tighter overseas capital scrutiny. Concurrently, a severe domestic property slump and a 19 per cent fall in the CSI 300 index eroded household wealth and heavily undermined consumer sentiment.
Q.Why was the United States unable to offset falling luxury demand in China?
Why was the United States unable to offset falling luxury demand in China?
American luxury spending contracted by at least 4 per cent between July and September due to rising fuel costs, cooling stock markets, and election-related household pressures. Consequently, subdued discretionary spending in the United States could not compensate for the sharper contractions across the Chinese market.
Q.How are luxury operators altering their business strategies across Asia?
How are luxury operators altering their business strategies across Asia?
Luxury operators are shifting capital allocations away from aggressive store footprint expansion across Asia. Instead, management teams are focusing on implementing strict cost controls and improving productivity gains per square metre within their existing retail locations.
Reader pulse
Can ultra-wealthy spending alone sustain European luxury groups?
21,356 votes so far