Businesses face conundrum image when placing ads on Youtube
In this article (5)
After the streaming website blocked the accounts of online gangster Kha Banh for violating its terms of service on April 3, YouTube also terminated the account of the god of profanity Duong Minh Tuyen, another self-proclaimed gangster, due to repeated violations of YouTube’s policies on violence.
Kha and Tuyen are two YouTubers who were recently condemned by the general public for uploading videos promoting gang culture, gambling and crudeness, but are adored and given superstar status by many Vietnamese youths.
The public outcry in the country against YouTube channels promoting violence, profanity, and repulsive material is worrying businesses who advertise on the platform.
Only recently Vietnam Maritime Bank (MSB) announced it was pulling out all its ads from YouTube. It would conduct a review with YouTube so that its ads would only appear on content compatible with “regulations, ethics and positivity,” it said.
The private bank’s ads have appeared in clips of internet gangster phenomenon Ngo Ba Kha (Kha Banh). Last week he was arrested and charged with gambling and organising gambling.
In 2017 many major companies such as Vinamilk and Ford Vietnam also demanded that YouTube should pull out their ads, voicing concern over its lack of content control causing their ads to be associated with dubious channels.
“Responsibility first lies with the content managers, or multi-channel networks authorised by YouTube if dubious channels register with them to make money,” Vo Do Thang, a cyber-security expert, said.
“Let’s also not rule out the possibility these content managers overlooked or even promoted negative content on purpose to make money off views.
“Some advertising agencies working with YouTube guarantee they will use tracking and filtering programmes using keywords and search terms to prevent enterprises’ ads appearing along with negative content.
“However, this cannot be 100 percent guaranteed by anyone, the risk to the brand image is still there.”
“However, this cannot be 100 percent guaranteed by anyone, the risk to the brand image is still there.”
Viet Phuong, who works for an advertising agency, said: “When uploading ads, there is an option not to post on specific channels. However, this job is tedious, and it is difficult for an advertising agency to cover everything unless the client hands their own list of channels. Sometimes this step is skipped, because it is more effective to run ads everywhere.”
He revealed however that his company had been working vigorously on channel filters since Kha Banh’s arrest.
YouTube’s mechanism prioritizes ads for videos with more views. Most agencies in Vietnam have successfully filtered political videos well, but entertainment channels are difficult to control because they garner much more viewership and are traditionally considered harmless.
However, agencies say their job is getting harder as videos with violent content are being uploaded in response to the general public finding them popular.
“Brands should cooperate closely with agencies or choose only to run ads in the mid-range of popularity, videos which do not fall into the ‘top/hot’ categories on YouTube,” Phuong said.
But despite these risks, it is hard for businesses to abandon the website and lose a large audience.
In 2017 the Authority of Broadcasting and Electronic Information estimated that Google and Facebook accounted for 80 percent of the online advertising market share in Vietnam.
The director of a major online business, who asked not to be named, said this ratio had probably not changed by much.
In other countries too, major businesses have withdrawn their ads from YouTube. In March 2017 Walmart and PepsiCo terminated their advertising contracts with it after their commercials were featured on videos featuring racist content.
Questions & Answers
Q.What specifically caused businesses to worry about advertising on YouTube?
What specifically caused businesses to worry about advertising on YouTube?
Businesses are concerned because there has been a public outcry in Vietnam against YouTube channels that promote violence, profanity, and repulsive material. This makes advertisers fear their brand image will be damaged if their ads appear alongside such content.
Q.Why is it challenging for advertising agencies to prevent ads from appearing on inappropriate YouTube channels?
Why is it challenging for advertising agencies to prevent ads from appearing on inappropriate YouTube channels?
Agencies find it tedious to manually select channels, and clients often don't provide specific lists. While tracking and filtering programmes exist, they cannot offer a 100% guarantee. Also, YouTube's system prioritises ads for popular videos, which can include problematic entertainment content.
Q.What measures have some businesses taken in response to these advertising concerns?
What measures have some businesses taken in response to these advertising concerns?
Vietnam Maritime Bank (MSB) recently pulled all its ads from YouTube to review content compatibility. In 2017, Vinamilk and Ford Vietnam also demanded ad removal due to content control issues. Major businesses like Walmart and PepsiCo have also withdrawn ads in other countries for similar reasons.
Q.Why do businesses find it difficult to stop advertising on YouTube despite the risks?
Why do businesses find it difficult to stop advertising on YouTube despite the risks?
Businesses struggle to abandon YouTube because they would lose access to a very large audience. Google and Facebook together accounted for an estimated 80 percent of the online advertising market share in Vietnam, making platforms like YouTube crucial for reach.
Reader pulse
Should brands pull ads from YouTube over content concerns?
17,610 votes so far