Apple gets warning for misleading consumers

In this article (5)
Tech giant Apple has been warned by the Commerce Commission of New Zealand after it likely misled customers, while online retailer NZSALE has pleaded guilty to four charges of failing to comply with product safety standards.
In the Commission’s view, Apple is likely to have breached the Fair Trading Act in a number of ways, including telling consumers its products are only covered by a guarantee for two years, which is in direct violation of the Consumer Guarantees Act (CGA) in that they do not expire after a legally prescribed period of time.
“Although businesses may form a view about how long a product should generally last, they must assess each reported fault on its own merits,” said Commissioner Anna Rawlings, “they should not base decisions solely on how long a consumer has owned a product. The reasonable lifespan of a product will depend very much on what the product is.”
Apple was also warned for pushing customers to the manufacturer of non-Apple branded products when Apple is responsible, as a retailer, for all products it sells.
“It is natural that many retailers may wish to liaise with manufacturers to assess and remedy product defects but they must not point blank refuse to address consumer complaints and refer consumers exclusively to manufacturers for attention,” Ms Rawlings said.
Additionally, NZSALE has been charged with failing to comply with the product safety standard for children’s nightwear, after it was found that three types of nightwear and a sleep sack were made of material that was too flammable to be used, did not carry the right fire hazard label, or had no fire hazard labelling at all.
The Commission’s investigation was sparked by a product recall of these products in Australia following an investigation by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. The products were publically recalled in New Zealand in December 2015.
In New Zealand 73 units were sold – although only eight garments were returned through the recall and a further 15 were confirmed destroyed by consumers.
Questions & Answers
Q.What specific actions by Apple led to the Commerce Commission's warning?
What specific actions by Apple led to the Commerce Commission's warning?
Apple was warned for telling customers its products had only a two-year guarantee, which violates the Consumer Guarantees Act. They also wrongly directed customers to manufacturers for non-Apple branded products Apple itself sold.
Q.What was the Commerce Commission's main concern regarding product guarantees and lifespans?
What was the Commerce Commission's main concern regarding product guarantees and lifespans?
The Commission believes businesses should not base product fault decisions solely on how long a consumer has owned an item. Each fault must be assessed on its own merits, considering the product's reasonable lifespan.
Q.What product safety issues did NZSALE face charges for?
What product safety issues did NZSALE face charges for?
NZSALE was charged for failing to comply with safety standards for children's nightwear. Three types of nightwear and a sleep sack were found to be too flammable or lacked proper fire hazard labelling.
Q.How many faulty NZSALE products were sold and returned in New Zealand?
How many faulty NZSALE products were sold and returned in New Zealand?
In New Zealand, 73 units of the faulty nightwear were sold. Only eight garments were returned through the recall, and a further 15 were confirmed destroyed by consumers.
Reader pulse
Is Apple's warranty approach common?
22,128 votes so far