7-Eleven settles franchisee class actions

In this article (5)
7-Eleven has agreed to settle franchisee class actions following mediation. A statement from the convenience chain confirmed the settlement but gave no insight into the details of the agreement.
“7-Eleven can confirm that a non-binding in-principle agreement to settle the class actions has been reached, subject to terms of a settlement deed being agreed and subject to the approval of the Federal Court of Australia.
“The settlement follows mediation between the parties on 24, 25, and 29 June 2021,” said 7-Eleven.
It’s been a rollercoaster ride since the class actions were mooted back in 2017.
In February 2018 Stewart Levitt, senior partner at Levitt Robinson Solicitors which was acting for the franchisees, filed a claim in the Federal Court.
The group of current and former franchisees alleged misleading and deceptive conduct, unconscionable conduct, and contract breaches by 7-Eleven, and alleged the ANZ bank had provided loans that were unsustainable.
Levitt Robinson believed “substantial damages” could be available.
However, the law firm had its knuckles metaphorically rapped when it was forced to retract statements made to franchisees in 2017.
In 2019 the class action hit a roadblock when the court accepted an undertaking from the convenience chain.
According to Lawyerly, an in-principle settlement was approved in August 2020 between ANZ and the applicants.
The class actions against 7-Eleven continued with a trial set for winter 2021. Lawyerly reported in May this year a judge rejected a proposal by the convenience chain for a pre-trial ruling and mediation took place in late June.
Questions & Answers
Q.What specifically were 7-Eleven franchisees accusing the company of in the class actions?
What specifically were 7-Eleven franchisees accusing the company of in the class actions?
The group of current and former franchisees alleged misleading and deceptive conduct, unconscionable conduct, and breaches of contract by 7-Eleven. They also claimed the ANZ bank provided loans that were unsustainable for them.
Q.Who represented the franchisees in their legal actions against 7-Eleven?
Who represented the franchisees in their legal actions against 7-Eleven?
The law firm Levitt Robinson Solicitors, with senior partner Stewart Levitt, was acting for the franchisees. They filed a claim in the Federal Court on their behalf in February 2018.
Q.Has a settlement been reached with all parties involved in the class actions?
Has a settlement been reached with all parties involved in the class actions?
An in-principle settlement between ANZ and the applicants was approved in August 2020. The recent agreement specifically confirms an in-principle settlement for the class actions against 7-Eleven.
Q.What is the current status of the settlement with 7-Eleven after the mediation?
What is the current status of the settlement with 7-Eleven after the mediation?
7-Eleven has confirmed a non-binding in-principle agreement to settle the class actions. This agreement is subject to the terms of a settlement deed being agreed and requires the approval of the Federal Court of Australia.
Reader pulse
What does this settlement mean for 7-Eleven?
21,380 votes so far