Skip to content
Food

Grape Co fined for misleading consumers on grape origins

By Minjun ParkAustralia
1 min read
Grapes
Grapes
In this article (5)

Grape Co Australia has been fined $34,920 by Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (ACCC) for making false and misleading representations on grape origins and breaching the Horticulture Code.

In a statement on its website, Victorian table grape traders said: “Every single one of our grapes is personally hand-selected from the finest fruit on our family’s estate in Sunraysia Australia.”

The statement later was found false and misleading under the Australian Consumer Law as it implied all grapes of Grape Co are grown in the family estate, however some of them are grown on third-party growers’ properties.

“Food producers must ensure they do not mislead consumers with marketing statements about the place of origin of goods or produce,” said Mick Keogh, deputy chair of ACCC. “This not only impacts consumers but can also prevent other businesses who are careful about being accurate in their marketing from competing on a level playing field.

“Consumers looking to support small businesses may make purchasing decisions based on representations that the produce is sourced from a family farm, and it is important they are not misled so they get what they pay for.”

The company has also been alleged of breaching The Horticulture Code as it traded without written Horticulture Produce Agreements when acting as an agent for grape growers, and failed to prepare, publish and make publicly available its terms of trade.

“Terms of trade allow growers to understand the services and aspects of trading provided by different traders so that growers can make an informed decision as to who they wish to supply produce to,” said Keogh.

Questions & Answers

Q.

What specific actions by Grape Co Australia led to them being fined for misleading consumers?

A.

Grape Co made false claims on its website, implying all grapes were from its family estate, when some were from third-party growers. This was found to be misleading under Australian Consumer Law.

Q.

What is the broader impact of businesses like Grape Co making misleading origin claims?

A.

Such claims not only impact consumers who wish to support small businesses but also disadvantage accurate competitors. It prevents a level playing field for businesses that are careful with their marketing.

Q.

Why is it important for traders to publish and make their terms of trade publicly available?

A.

Publishing terms of trade allows growers to understand the services and trading aspects offered by different traders. This helps growers make informed decisions about who they wish to supply their produce to.

Reader pulse

Will this fine deter other origin misrepresentations?

22,133 votes so far

Weekly Briefing

Asia's retail intelligence, in your inbox

Tuesday, Thursday and a Saturday Weekly Wrap: the retail stories, numbers and moves that mattered across Asia. Nothing else, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

  • Top industry moves and market shifts
  • Weekly data-driven analysis from across Asia
  • Tuesday, Thursday and the Saturday Weekly Wrap

Read by retail operators, investors and brand teams across Asia.

Protected by a quick human check. No spam, ever. Unsubscribe in one click.

SecureGDPR ready